The prejudice of DNA- TPPR
DNA TRANSFER FACTORS The factors of DNA transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery (DNA – TPPR) can be both relevant and prejudicial to the jury. The prejudice of DNA – TPPR manifests when the court forms a false understanding that the general principles are evidence of a scientific evaluation of the...
DNA before New Zealand courts
The R v Wells conviction and New Zealand High Court appeal, illuminates novel "fragile sperm" DNA expert opinion. The opinion was acknowledged to be without no supporting data, and was led in support where no sperm had in fact been detected. Such expert speculations are consistent features of known DNA...
Sexual assault defence and DNA
Jurors find DNA to be the most important physical evidence and unchallenged DNA has led to known Australian wrongful conviction. A robust sexual assault defence and DNA are critically connected when the courts ask a jury to decide “who” and “how”. In this article, we cover a specific sexual assault...
DNA transfer “more likely” is not science
DNA Transfer When considering "how" the DNA was deposited, we must not apply "more likely" before the courts, and should correctly apply the scientific approach defined as Activity Level Reporting. "more likely" statements in expert evidence have been prevalent in known DNA wrongful convictions which is detailed further in Fitzgerald...
DNA expert certificate – lawyer interpretation guide
Lawyer interpretation guide Criminal matters involving DNA can be evidenced by the crown in various ways, depending in part upon the particular state lab, severity of the matter, and the maturity of the matter before the courts. In Australia, all states and territories will at some stage serve a form...
Fitzgerald wrongful conviction – Why it can happen again
Fitzgerald wrongful conviction The DNA wrongful conviction Fitzgerald v R turned on how the DNA was deposited. The scientifically invalid "DNA more likely" repeats itself in 2024 Australian courts as it did in the Fitzgerald wrongful conviction To consider "how" DNA was transferred, the DNA expert must conduct Activity Level...
Efficacy of expert evidence
“White coat effect” The efficacy of evidence at trial, is undoubtedly predicated on how that evidence is perceived by jurors, and the court. The preparation of inherently complex scientific and forensic evidence must be purposeful and meticulous. It is critical that evidence presented to the jury is clear, simple and...
