DNA Transfer in Criminal Cases

DNA Transfer in Criminal Cases

DNA transfer refers to the movement of DNA from one person, object, or surface to another, either through direct contact or indirect mechanisms such as secondary transfer. In criminal cases, DNA transfer is critical because the detection of a DNA profile does not, of itself, explain how the DNA was deposited, when it was deposited, or whether it resulted from the alleged activity.

Modern forensic science recognises that DNA can be transferred through intermediary surfaces, other individuals, shared environments, or routine handling. As a result, the presence of DNA does not necessarily indicate direct involvement in an offence, nor does it reliably establish timing or manner of contact.

The sensitivity of contemporary DNA testing means that profiles may be generated from very small amounts of biological material. Without careful evaluation at the activity level, DNA evidence may be given greater probative weight than the science can properly support.

DNA transfer must also be considered alongside persistence and contamination. DNA may persist for variable periods, and handling or environmental factors may influence where DNA is ultimately detected. These factors further complicate assumptions about the significance of DNA findings.

Forensic laboratory reports typically address DNA at the source level only. Questions of transfer mechanism and evidentiary significance therefore require independent scientific evaluation.

 

DNA transfer refers to the movement of DNA from one person, object, or surface to another, either through direct contact or indirect mechanisms such as secondary transfer. In criminal cases, DNA transfer is critical because the detection of a DNA profile does not, of itself, explain how the DNA was deposited, when it was deposited, or whether it resulted from the alleged activity.

Modern forensic science recognises that DNA can be transferred through intermediary surfaces, other individuals, shared environments, or routine handling. As a result, the presence of DNA does not necessarily indicate direct involvement in an offence, nor does it reliably establish timing or manner of contact.

The sensitivity of contemporary DNA testing means that profiles may be generated from very small amounts of biological material. Without careful evaluation at the activity level, DNA evidence may be given greater probative weight than the science can properly support.

DNA transfer must also be considered alongside persistence and contamination. DNA may persist for variable periods, and handling or environmental factors may influence where DNA is ultimately detected. These factors further complicate assumptions about the significance of DNA findings.

Forensic laboratory reports typically address DNA at the source level only. Questions of transfer mechanism and evidentiary significance therefore require independent scientific evaluation.

 

We assist criminal lawyers by:
  • – Evaluating how the DNA may have been deposited, and what alternative pathways remain plausible
    – Reviewing DNA findings alongside collection, handling and packaging information
    – Assessing transfer and persistence considerations at activity level
    – Identifying assumptions that may be driving the interpretation
    – Providing clear, courtroom-focused advice to support case strategy
    – Assisting with cross-examination preparation and expert reporting where required
Issues we frequently encounter during reviews of DNA evidence:
  • – Low-level DNA and increased uncertainty
  • – Source-level results overstated as “contact” or involvement
  • – Unknown biological source
  • – Handling and packaging pathways overlooked
  • – Investigator-mediated contamination risks
  • – Unsupported “wearer” or “user” assumptions
  • – Statistics relied upon without context
Consider a review of the DNA evidence when:
  • – The DNA finding is central to the case
  • – The profile is low-level, mixed, or complex
  • – How the DNA got there is disputed (transfer is in issue)
  • – DNA presence is being treated as proof of contact/use
  • – Handling, packaging or contamination risks are realistic
  • – Indirect transfer is a plausible alternative explanation
Depending on your needs we can provide:
  • – Written advice / conference notes
  • – Preliminary guidance
  • – Expert witness report
  • – Cross-examination support materials
  • – Case consultations via video conference

If you are unsure whether the forensic evidence warrants expert involvement, I can provide an initial view and a quote for the appropriate level of review — from targeted advice through to full reporting and trial support.

What we do
We assist criminal lawyers by:
  • – Evaluating how the DNA may have been deposited, and what alternative pathways remain plausible
    – Reviewing DNA findings alongside collection, handling and packaging information
    – Assessing transfer and persistence considerations at activity level
    – Identifying assumptions that may be driving the interpretation
    – Providing clear, courtroom-focused advice to support case strategy
    – Assisting with cross-examination preparation and expert reporting where required
Common issues
Issues we frequently encounter during reviews of DNA evidence:
  • – Low-level DNA and increased uncertainty
  • – Source-level results overstated as “contact” or involvement
  • – Unknown biological source
  • – Handling and packaging pathways overlooked
  • – Investigator-mediated contamination risks
  • – Unsupported “wearer” or “user” assumptions
  • – Statistics relied upon without context
When to use us
Consider a review of the DNA evidence when:
  • – The DNA finding is central to the case
  • – The profile is low-level, mixed, or complex
  • – How the DNA got there is disputed (transfer is in issue)
  • – DNA presence is being treated as proof of contact/use
  • – Handling, packaging or contamination risks are realistic
  • – Indirect transfer is a plausible alternative explanation
What you get
Depending on your needs we can provide:
  • – Written advice / conference notes
  • – Preliminary guidance
  • – Expert witness report
  • – Cross-examination support materials
  • – Case consultations via video conference
Quotation

If you are unsure whether the forensic evidence warrants expert involvement, I can provide an initial view and a quote for the appropriate level of review — from targeted advice through to full reporting and trial support.

DISCUSS DNA TRANSFER IN YOUR CASE

Early, strategic advice is often informal and does not require a full report

How DNA transfer occurs

DNA transfer must also be considered alongside persistence and contamination. DNA may persist for variable periods, and handling or environmental factors may influence where DNA is ultimately detected. These factors further complicate assumptions about the significance of DNA findings.

Forensic laboratory reports typically address DNA at the source level only. Questions of transfer mechanism and evidentiary significance therefore require independent scientific evaluation.

Secondary DNA transfer and criminal evidence

Secondary DNA transfer involves the movement of DNA to an item through an intermediate surface or person rather than direct contact. In criminal cases, this mechanism is particularly relevant where assumptions are made about handling, use, or involvement based solely on DNA presence.

DNA detected on clothing, firearms, vehicles, or other frequently handled items may result from indirect transfer rather than direct interaction. Without careful evaluation, DNA findings may be interpreted as evidence of involvement when alternative transfer pathways remain scientifically plausible.

Forensic laboratories rarely provide opinions on whether secondary transfer is likely in a particular case. As a result, the potential significance of secondary DNA transfer may remain unexplored unless it is specifically addressed through expert interpretation.

Courts have recognised that DNA evidence may be admitted yet given little weight where plausible indirect transfer pathways remain unresolved.

Helen Roebuck DNA expert giving evidence

DNA Persistence: Why Timing Assumptions Are Unreliable

DNA persistence refers to how long DNA may remain detectable after deposition. In practice, persistence is highly variable and influenced by factors such as surface type, environmental exposure, handling, and individual shedding characteristics.

Importantly, the presence of DNA does not indicate when it was deposited. DNA may pre-date the alleged offence, arise from unrelated contact, or be transferred indirectly. Conversely, the absence of DNA does not reliably indicate that contact did not occur.

DNA persistence does not operate as a clock. Timing inferences drawn from DNA findings should therefore be approached with caution.

DNA COntamination AND handling considerations

DNA contamination refers to the unintended movement or introduction of DNA during collection, handling, packaging, storage, or examination. It is best understood as one pathway within broader DNA transfer mechanisms.

Given the sensitivity of modern DNA testing, small amounts of DNA may be transferred through routine handling or shared equipment, even where procedures are followed in good faith. These risks are inherent to forensic practice and must be evaluated in context.

Laboratory reports often contain limited information about pre-submission handling. Where DNA findings appear inconsistent with alleged activity, handling and contamination considerations may provide a scientifically plausible explanation requiring further evaluation.

Why DNA TRANSFER REQUIRES EXPERT INTERPRETATION

Laboratory testing identifies whose DNA may be present but does not determine how or when it was deposited. Questions of transfer mechanism and activity-level significance require structured scientific interpretation.

Expert evaluation assists in identifying assumptions underlying DNA interpretations, assessing whether alternative transfer pathways remain plausible, and ensuring that DNA evidence is not given greater probative weight than it can reliably support.

Independent interpretation helps ensure that DNA evidence presented to the court reflects both its strengths and its limitations.

The presence of a person’s DNA on an item does not establish that they directly handled it. DNA can be deposited through indirect pathways, including secondary or tertiary transfer. Lawyers must guard against assumptions that equate DNA presence with physical interaction, particularly where objects are commonly handled or have moved between multiple people or environments.

Secondary DNA transfer occurs easily through everyday interactions such as handshakes or shared surfaces. This mechanism is well documented in forensic studies but is frequently underexplained in court. Lawyers must consider whether an alternative, innocent transfer pathway could reasonably account for the DNA findings, especially in the absence of corroborating evidence.

Highly sensitive DNA testing can detect extremely small quantities of genetic material. While powerful, low-level DNA results are more vulnerable to contamination, transfer, and stochastic effects. Lawyers must assess whether trace DNA evidence has been given disproportionate evidential weight relative to its scientific limitations and uncertainty.

Forensic DNA analysis generally addresses source-level questions, not how or when DNA was deposited. Activity-level propositions require careful scientific consideration beyond profile comparison. Lawyers must ensure that DNA evidence is not used to infer specific actions unless transfer, persistence, and context have been properly evaluated and explained.

DNA interpretation involves assumptions about contributors, transfer mechanisms, and context. Different assumptions can lead to different conclusions from the same data. Lawyers must be alert to whether these assumptions are justified, disclosed, and balanced, as unsupported assumptions can significantly overstate the apparent strength of DNA evidence.

Direct Contact

The presence of a person’s DNA on an item does not establish that they directly handled it. DNA can be deposited through indirect pathways, including secondary or tertiary transfer. Lawyers must guard against assumptions that equate DNA presence with physical interaction, particularly where objects are commonly handled or have moved between multiple people or environments.

Secondary Transfer

Secondary DNA transfer occurs easily through everyday interactions such as handshakes or shared surfaces. This mechanism is well documented in forensic studies but is frequently underexplained in court. Lawyers must consider whether an alternative, innocent transfer pathway could reasonably account for the DNA findings, especially in the absence of corroborating evidence.

Low Level DNA

Highly sensitive DNA testing can detect extremely small quantities of genetic material. While powerful, low-level DNA results are more vulnerable to contamination, transfer, and stochastic effects. Lawyers must assess whether trace DNA evidence has been given disproportionate evidential weight relative to its scientific limitations and uncertainty.

Activity Level

Forensic DNA analysis generally addresses source-level questions, not how or when DNA was deposited. Activity-level propositions require careful scientific consideration beyond profile comparison. Lawyers must ensure that DNA evidence is not used to infer specific actions unless transfer, persistence, and context have been properly evaluated and explained.

Interpretation v Data

DNA interpretation involves assumptions about contributors, transfer mechanisms, and context. Different assumptions can lead to different conclusions from the same data. Lawyers must be alert to whether these assumptions are justified, disclosed, and balanced, as unsupported assumptions can significantly overstate the apparent strength of DNA evidence.

Helen Roebuck DNA expert Sydney

Why Roebuck Forensics

I have worked across every part of the forensic process - from crime scenes, to laboratory interpretation, to expert witness testimony.

My focus is not simply the presence of DNA or a statistic.

It is what the evidence can actually support — in the context of the case.

Next Step

If you’d like to discuss whether the forensic evidence in your matter warrants further review:

Contact Roebuck Forensics

A preliminary DNA expert review can be a useful step in assessing the broad strengths and weaknesses of a particular matter. This process can also identify documentary and any further evidence requirements.

Rigorous interrogation of the evidence will uncover underlying issues and determine the most appropriate pathway towards reviewing and reporting the matter.

Certain complex matters benefit from a draft DNA expert report, which can open areas for discussion with Counsel, and potentially allow for defence to approach the prosecution.

Following a thorough evaluation of the evidence, a DNA expert report will be issued in accordance with the expert witness code of conduct. The report will be suitable for submission in evidence.

Preparations with Counsel are often conducted, such that the probative value of the evidence is weighed effectively and persuasively at Voir Dire, should such a hearing be required.

Extensive preparations are generally conducted in anticipation of substantive hearing. Which may include cross examination and evidence in chief scenarios specific to the matter .

DNA TRANSFER QUESTIONS

What is DNA transfer in forensic cases?

DNA transfer refers to the movement of DNA from a person to an object or surface. This can occur through direct contact (primary transfer) or indirectly via another person or object (secondary transfer).

Can DNA be transferred without a person touching an object?

Yes. Secondary DNA transfer is well established in forensic science. DNA can be transferred through intermediaries such as other people, clothing, or surfaces. This means DNA may appear on an object even if the person never directly handled it, which is a critical consideration in criminal cases.

Does the presence of DNA prove someone handled an item?

No. DNA presence alone cannot establish how or when the DNA was deposited. DNA analysis typically cannot distinguish between direct contact, indirect transfer, or innocent prior contact. Courts must consider DNA findings alongside transfer mechanisms and case context rather than assuming handling occurred.

How common is secondary DNA transfer?

Secondary DNA transfer is common and can occur during routine everyday interactions. Studies have shown that brief contact, such as a handshake followed by handling an object, can result in detectable DNA transfer. Its likelihood depends on factors such as shedding propensity, surface type, and handling conditions.

Why is DNA transfer a risk in touch DNA cases?

Touch DNA samples often contain very small amounts of DNA. These low-level samples are particularly vulnerable to transfer, contamination, and interpretational uncertainty. As a result, touch DNA evidence carries a higher risk of misleading conclusions if transfer mechanisms are not carefully considered.

Can forensic DNA analysis determine when DNA was deposited?

Generally, no. Forensic DNA analysis cannot reliably determine when DNA was deposited or how long it has been present. Without additional contextual evidence, DNA results cannot establish whether DNA was deposited during the alleged offence or at an earlier, innocent time.

How does DNA transfer affect mixed DNA profiles?

DNA transfer can contribute to complex DNA mixtures involving multiple contributors. Transfer mechanisms may introduce DNA from individuals who were not present at the alleged activity. Interpreting such mixtures requires careful assessment of transfer possibilities and contributor assumptions.

Is DNA transfer routinely considered in forensic reports?

DNA transfer is not always fully addressed in standard forensic reports, particularly where conclusions focus on profile comparisons or statistics. An independent DNA expert can assess whether transfer mechanisms were adequately considered and whether alternative explanations were properly evaluated.

Can DNA transfer lead to wrongful conclusions in court?

Yes. If DNA transfer is not properly considered, courts may incorrectly infer direct involvement based solely on DNA presence. Overlooking transfer risks can lead to overstated conclusions and misinterpretation of the evidence, particularly in cases relying heavily on DNA results.

When should a lawyer seek expert advice on DNA transfer?

Expert advice should be sought when DNA evidence is central to the case, involves low-level or mixed profiles, or where indirect transfer is a plausible explanation. Early expert input helps ensure DNA evidence is  interpreted accurately and prevents assumptions from shaping legal strategy.

CONTACT

×

LAWYERS-DNA TOOLKIT

Enter