Secondary DNA Transfer and the Limits of DNA Evidence: Lessons from R v Ke

DNA Evidence Exclusion

The Forensic Issue Before the Court


Secondary DNA Transfer and Sexual Assault Evidence


Exclusion of the DNA Evidence Under s 137


Why R v Ke Remains Significant

  • the presence of DNA does not establish how it was deposited
  • secondary DNA transfer may remain a live possibility
  • DNA evidence may be excluded where it cannot resolve the fact in issue
  • strong scientific limitations can outweigh apparent evidentiary strength

Independent Expert Evidence and Activity-Level Evaluation


Conclusion

Name(Required)
Please provide a brief summary of your issue or question.

×

LAWYERS – DNA RESOURCE

  • No sign-up required
  • Enter