87% of latex gloves contaminated
Investigator Mediated DNA Contamination can significantly complicate what can be understood regarding DNA deposition in the matter and frequently leads to exclusion of evidence.
Inquire now for 2025 matters
This page provides comprehensive DNA for lawyers as it relates to 2025 criminal proceedings . Content is frequently updated and expanded to follow the continual evolution of science, lab process and how DNA is evidenced before the courts.
Please use the page link to share content to ensure the current material is resourced.
Jan 6 2025; NIST publish DNA Mixture Interpretation; a scientific foundation review, aimed at further guiding labs on mixed DNA profile interpretation.
Dec 7 2024: In closing, Martin Hinton KC states that Steven Hainsworth’s DNA compared to DNA upon and around Mrs Harrisons body provides a match with “extremely strong support”.
Dec 6 2024: US county lab identifies plastic plates as the 7 year source of lab DNA contamination and lifts testing suspension.
Dec 2 2024: NSW Supreme Court will imminently consider the DNA relating to the Janine Balding murder conviction in 1990.
Nov 29 2024: The chief justice of Tasmania’s Supreme Court cited “unacceptable delays” in police paperwork for contributing to a growing backlog of criminal cases.
Nov 26 2024: VIC major drugs squad detective guilty of fabricating DNA evidence and sentenced to 3 years custodial..
Nov 25 2024: NT silk John Lawrence calls for NAAJA board resignations. CLP “extra 1 mil ” for NT legal aid, drop in the bucket.
Nov 23 2024: NSW district court judge Peter McGrath references case delays and the “underfunding of courts, courthouses and magistrates and judges ” , as an “intolerable” situation.
Nov 22 2024: Royal Commission hears that SA regional services do not have sufficient resources to collect time critical evidence.
Nov 21 2024: QLD lab head hunts senior reporting scientists from VIC and NSW labs.
Nov 16 2024: QLD are reportedly reducing DNA sample intake numbers including sexual assault where consent is significant.
Nov 12 2024: Noticeable increase in NSW DNA Local Court matters that would commonly have moved up to District Court.
Nov 11 2024: QLD appoint Kirsty Wright to “undertake an extensive assessment of the progress of reforms and examine the progress of the testing of samples related to historic cases“.
Nov 8 2024: SA LSC funding reluctance deepens alongside efforts to evidence FSSA Activity Level Reports.
Oct 2024: NT funding crisis appears to have all but ceased defence DNA expert involvement.
Oct 2024: NSW FASS late service of reports continues. Prosecution seeks orders of lab in instances.
Sep 2024: Promega files patent for first-of-it’s kind enzyme that minimises stutter artifacts in STR analysis.
Sep 2024: QLD Supreme Court Practice Direction 14 appears to be causing more substantive lab expert reports.
Aug 2024: QLD lab continues outsourcing significant testing to ESR in New Zealand to ease substantial backlogs.
” Large quantity of DNA supports direct transfer”
a) The quantity of DNA cannot be used to evaluate the question of direct transfer.
b) Studies show that direct transfer more consistently results in greater amounts of DNA than does indirect deposit.
The relationship between a) and b) must be managed skilfully at hearing to avoid misleading the jury.
” Every contact leaves a trace “
Locard’s principle is somewhat erroneously applied to the principles of DNA transfer. It is scientifically understood that detectible levels of DNA may not be left upon contact.
” It is more likely “
“more likely” has misled the courts as to the strength of DNA results in countless trials over the last 20 years, and continues today. A scientist must only weight the results through a recognised evaluative process. A likelihood ratio is a valid evaluation, a mere “more likely” is nothing more than speculation.
” the data supports this “
When referencing “data” at trial, an expert should have cited and evidenced that data. Such Ad-hoc references to data may mislead the listener towards a perception that an evaluation using the data has been conducted by the speaker.
” must review the Raw Data “
A pervasive thread in the Australian legal community espouses an insistence that thorough defence process shall encompass a review of the Raw Data. This work is highly specialised, complex and extremely onerous.. Review of the DNA profiles will flag whether the Raw Data warrants review. The frequency to which I have even considered a Raw Data review could be counted on one hand.
” the BLOOD “
Jurors may be prejudiced when hearing suspected biological fluids spoken of factually. Participants should avoid referencing “blood” or “semen” for example, unless the presence is confirmed scientifically. “reddish brown stain” may be suitable if the stain appears as such.
Adventitious match: an association of an evidence DNA profile to the profile of a person who is not the true donor of that profile; can also be referred to as a false inclusion.
Allele: [al-leel] one of two or more versions of a gene at a particular location (a locus) in the genome.
Allele drop-in: allelic peak(s) in an electropherogram that are not reproducible across multiple independent amplification events and may be attributable to sporadic contamination events.
Allele drop-out: when a sample is typed, and an allele is not present. Can occur when an insufficient quantity of DNA is present.
Allele frequency: the number of times that an allele appears in a data set representative of a particular population.
Allelic ladder: in STR testing, a measurement calibration tool, consisting of the most commonly observed alleles, used for assigning an allele designation to a peak in an electropherogram.
Amelogenin: a commonly used sex-typing genetic marker targeting the X chromosome and the Y chromosome. Females (X,X) samples result in a single peak while males (X,Y) have two peaks.
Amplification: an increase in the number of copies of a specific DNA fragment; refers to the use of the PCR technique to produce many more copies of DNA at specific genetic loci.
Analytical threshold: an acceptable “Relative Fluorescence Units” (RFU) level determined to be appropriate for use in the PCR/STR DNA typing process. A minimum threshold for data comparison is identified by the specific forensic laboratory doing the testing through independent validation studies.
Artifact: any non-allelic product of the amplification process (e.g., stutter or non-template addition), anomaly of the detection process (e.g., pull-up or spike), or a by-product of primer synthesis (e.g., dye blob) that may be observed in an electropherogram; may complicate interpretation of a DNA profile when they cannot be distinguished from actual allele(s) data.
Autosome: a chromosome not involved in sex determination; the diploid human genome consists of 46 chromosomes, 22 pairs of autosomes, and one pair of sex chromosomes (the X and Y chromosomes).
Bayesian approach: defines the probability of an event as the degree of belief in the truth of a proposition that asserts it will happen.
Buccal swab: a relatively non-invasive technique of scrapping the inside of a mouth with a cotton swab or similar collection device to collect cells from the inner cheek lining; a common method for collecting and preserving samples for DNA testing from known individuals.
Capillary electrophoresis (CE): an electrophoretic technique for separating DNA molecules by their size based on migration through a narrow glass capillary tube filled with a liquid polymer.
Cell: the basic building block of an organism; humans have approximately 30 trillion cells in their body, most containing DNA .
Chromosome: the structure by which hereditary information is physically transmitted from one generation to the next; humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes.
Cold hit: an association made between a crime scene DNA profile and a DNA profile found on a DNA database in the absence of any prior investigative leads; this association may be to another crime scene DNA profile or to a profile from a known individual
Complete profile: a full DNA result with values being obtained from all attempted loci.
Complex mixture: DNA profile resulting from a sample containing three or more contributors often having only a small amount of DNA from at least one of the contributors
Conservative: an assignment of the weight of evidence that is believed to favour the defence.
Consensus profile: the resulting DNA profile made up from the list of alleles that are repeated when a sample is amplified multiple times.
Contamination: DNA or other biological material that is introduced to a DNA sample or item of evidence; the exogenous DNA or biological material could be present before the sample is collected or introduced during collection or testing of the sample.
Controls: samples of known types, run in parallel with experimental, reference, or evidence samples, that are used to demonstrate that a procedure is working correctly.
Deconvolution: separation of component DNA genotypes of contributors to a mixed DNA profile based on quantitative peak height information and any underlying assumptions (e.g., the number of contributors to the mixture, mixture ratios, or known contributors).
Deduced profile: inference of an unknown contributor’s DNA profile after taking into consideration the contribution of a known/assumed contributor’s DNA profile based on quantitative peak height information in a mixed DNA profile.
Degradation: the fragmenting, or breakdown, of DNA by chemical, physical, or biological means; a common occurrence when biological samples containing DNA encounter warm moist environments or excessive UV light.
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA): the molecule that carries genetic information for the development and functioning of an organism; DNA is a fairly stable molecule and variations in DNA sequence between individuals permits DNA testing to distinguish individuals from one another.
Detection limit: the smallest amount of some component of interest that can be measured by a single measurement with a stated level of confidence.
Differential extraction: a DNA extraction procedure where the sperm cells are physically separated from the DNA of other cells before the sperm DNA is isolated; generally results in a sperm and non-sperm (epithelial) fraction.
DNA database: a computer repository of DNA profiles.
DNA profile: a string of values (numbers or letters) compiled from the results of DNA testing at one or more genetic markers; can be single source or a mixture from multiple contributors.
DNA profiling or typing: any methodology for generating data from a biological sample at one or more DNA loci; DNA test results can be compared to results obtained from other samples DNA sequence.
Double helix: the native form of DNA, which looks like a twisted ladder; two linear strands of DNA assume this shape.
Dye blobs: artifact peaks in capillary electropherograms arising from fluorescent dye molecules during the PCR process.
Electropherogram (EPG): the format in which DNA typing results are presented with the X -axis displaying the observed alleles in order of increasing size and the Y-axis recording the relative amount of DNA detected based on the fluorescent signal collected during analysis.
Electrophoresis: a technique in which molecules are separated by their size in an electric field.
Elimination database: collection of DNA profiles held in a searchable format whose access/role/activities are deemed to be a potential DNA contamination risk; DNA profiles from an elimination database may be used to identify instances of inadvertent contamination.
Elimination sample: a sample collected from an individual who had lawful access to the crime scene (e.g., the spouse of a rape victim, police investigators, laboratory staff.
Epithelial cells: skin cells, vaginal cells, or other cells that are normally found on an inner or outer body surface.
Eukaryote: [yoo-kar-ee-oht] an organism with cells containing a nucleus.
Evidence sample: biological sample collected from a crime scene or people or objects associated with a crime scene; sometimes referred to as a crime scene sample
Exclusion: a conclusion statement that a biological sample did not originate from a particular source or individual.
Expert system: a software program or set of software programs that interprets the data generated from a DNA analysis instrument platform in accordance with laboratory-defined quality assurance rules and accurately identifies the data that does and does not satisfy such rules.
Extraction: the process of isolating DNA from the cells of an organism isolated from a sample. It involves breaking open the cells, removing proteins and other contaminants, and purifying the DNA so that it is free of other cellular components.
Fluorescence: the emission of light from a molecule following its excitation by light energy.
Forensic science: the application of scientific knowledge to questions of civil and criminal law, typically through presentation of results from evidence in court.
FST/Theta: the between-person inbreeding coefficient used in subpopulation corrections; commonly equated with the theta (θ) correction
Gene: the basic unit of heredity; a sequence of DNA nucleotides on a chromosome passed from parents to offspring that specifies traits.
Genetics: branch of biology that deals with the heredity and variation of organisms.
Genome: the entire DNA sequence found in a cell; the human genome consists of approximately 3.1 billion base pairs of DNA sequence.
Genotype: the genetic makeup of an organism, as characterized by its physical appearance or phenotype; with STR DNA testing, a locus genotype generally consists of two alleles, inherited from one’s mother and father.
GlobalFiler: a multiplex STR typing kit from Applied Biosystems that co-amplifies 21 autosomal STRs, DYS391, a Y indel, and the sex-typing marker amelogenin.
Guidelines: a set of general principles used to provide direction and parameters for decision making.
Haplotype: refers to a set of DNA variants along a single chromosome that tend to be inherited together; applicable to Y Chromosome (YSTR) testing.
Heredity: transmission of characteristics from one generation to the next.
Heterozygote: an individual having different alleles at a particular genetic locus.
Homozygote: an individual having the same (or indistinguishable) alleles at a particular locus due to the inheritance of the same allele from each parent.
Inclusion: a conclusion statement that a biological sample may have originated from a particular source or individual.
Inconclusive: data are inadequate to draw any meaningful conclusions.
Indistinguishable mixture: a DNA mixture in which relative peak height ratios/areas as determined from the electropherogram are insufficient to attribute alleles to individual contributor(s); generally observed when a similar amount of DNA from each contributor is present in the original extracted sample such that no clear major or minor contributor can be discerned.
Inheritance: the reception of genetic qualities by transmission from parent to offspring.
Inhibitor: as related to PCR, any substance that interferes with or prevents the synthesis of DNA during the amplification process; an example of an inhibitor is indigo dye in denim.
Internal size standard (ISS): specific DNA fragments of known length that are used to size other DNA fragments in a sample being measured; in STR testing, sometimes referred to as an internal lane standard (ILS).
Intimate sample: a biological sample from an evidence item that is obtained directly from an individual’s body such as a vaginal swab.
In vitro: Outside a living organism; literally “in glass” meaning biochemical reactions conducted in a test tube or other laboratory apparatus.
In vivo: within the cell or organism.
Kinship analysis: comparison of genetic profiles of two or more individuals to evaluate alternative degrees of relatedness.
Known sample: biological material for which the identity of the donor is established and used for comparison purposes.
Likelihood ratio: the probability of the evidence under one proposition divided by the probability of the evidence under an alternative, mutually exclusive proposition; the magnitude of its value expresses the weight of the evidence. Typically aligns to the prosecution proposition and defence propositions.
Loci: [low-sigh] plural of locus.
Locus: a unique physical location of a gene (or a specific sequence of DNA) on a chromosome.
Low-copy-number (LCN) DNA testing: the analysis of a small quantity of DNA often conducted by increasing the number of PCR amplification cycles.
Major contributor: the source of the predominant portion of the DNA in a mixed sample that generates a mixture profile.
Marker: a gene or specific DNA sequence of known location on a chromosome; used as a point of reference in the mapping of other loci.
Match: genetic profiles show the same types at all loci tested and no unexplainable differences exist.
Match probability: uses conditional probabilities to address the question “given that a particular DNA profile has been seen in the crime scene evidence and in the suspect, what is the chance of it occurring again?”
Minor contributor: source of the lesser portion of the DNA in a mixed sample that generates a mixture profile.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): a DNA molecule located in the mitochondria of the cell; the abundance of hundreds of copies of mtDNA in each cell make it useful with samples originating from limited or damaged biological material; requires a specialised form of DNA testing.
Mixed DNA sample: any biological sample containing DNA from more than one individual.
Mixture: DNA typing results originating from two or more individuals.
Mixture ratio: relative ratio of the DNA contributions of multiple individuals to a mixed DNA typing result as determined by the use of quantitative peak height information; can be used to discern major and minor contributors to a DNA profile.
Multiplex PCR: co-amplification of multiple regions of a genome.
Mutation: an alteration or change of an allele at a genetic locus resulting in genetic inconsistency between a biological parent and offspring.
Nanogram (ng): a billionth of a gram.
Negative control: a sample containing only PCR amplification reagents without the addition of template DNA; can be used to detect contamination introduced into the assay during the testing process via reagents, disposables, or handling errors.
Non-sperm cell fraction: the portion of a sample produced during differential extraction containing DNA from non-sperm cells; also referred to as the epithelial cell or female fraction.
Nuclear DNA: DNA contained within a nucleus of a cell.
Nucleus: the cellular organelle in eukaryotes that contains the genetic material.
Partial profile: a DNA profile for which complete typing results are not obtained at all tested loci; may be due to limited DNA template, DNA degradation, inhibition, preferential amplification, and/or stochastic effects.
Peak height: the maximum y-axis value obtained for a data peak; measured in relative fluorescence units (RFU) and reflects the quantity of the PCR product being measured.
Peak height ratio (PHR): the relative ratio of two peaks at a given locus; may be calculated by dividing the peak height of the longer length allele by the peak height of the shorter length allele or by dividing the shorter peak height by the taller peak; also called heterozygote balance (Hb).
Phenotype: the set of observable characteristics or traits of an organism, includes features such as eye colour and hair colour.
Picogram (pg): a trillionth of a gram; there are approximately 6 pg of DNA in a single human cell.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR): an in vitro process that yields millions of copies of desired DNA through repeated cycling of a reaction involving the DNA polymerase enzyme.
Polymorphism: difference in DNA sequence among individuals.
Population: a group of individuals residing in a given area at a given time.
Population substructure: the existence of subpopulations with different allele frequencies.
Positive control: an analytical control sample that can be used to determine if a test works properly.
Power of discrimination: the potential power of a genetic marker or set of markers to differentiate between any two people chosen at random.
PowerPlex 21: a multiplex STR typing kit from Promega Corporation that co-amplifies 15 STRs and the sex-typing marker amelogenin.
Presumptive test: an initial examination of evidence to indicate the possible source of the sample (e.g., blood, saliva, semen, etc.); usually followed up by a confirmatory assay or DNA analysis.
Probabilistic genotyping: use of statistical modelling informed by biological data, statistical theory, computer algorithms and/or probability distributions to infer genotypes and/or calculate likelihood ratios.
Probability: assuming that all outcomes are equally probable, the probability of event A is the number of ways event A can happen divided by the total number of possible outcomes.
Odds: the odds of an event occurring is the ratio of two competing probabilities—the probability that an event will occur and the probability that it will not occur; if the probability of the event is p, the probability that it will not occur is 1 – p; the odds are therefore p/(1-p).
Proficiency test: a quality assurance measure used to monitor performance of an analyst and identify areas in which improvement may be needed; can be internal (produced by the agency undergoing the test) or external (produced by an outside test provider).
Pull-up: an artifact that may occur during analysis of fluorescently labelled DNA fragments when signal from one dye colour channel produces artificial peaks in another; sometimes referred to as bleed-through.
Quality assurance (QA): a system of activities whose purpose is to provide to the producer or user of a product or service the assurance that it meets defined standards of quality.
Random Match Probability (RMP): the probability that an unknown individual in a given population has a particular profile.
Reference sample: a sample (typically blood or buccal swab) taken from a known person that is used for comparison purposes to an evidentiary sample.
Sex chromosomes (X and Y chromosomes): chromosomes that are different in the two sexes and involved in sex determination.
Sexual assault investigation kit (SAK): a set of items used by medical personnel to collect and preserve physical sexual assault evidence for use in a criminal investigation.
Short tandem repeats (STR): multiple copies of an identical DNA sequence arranged in direct succession, the number of repeat units can vary between individuals.
Source attribution: a decision which identifies an individual as the source of the DNA that produced an evidentiary single-source or major contributor profile; the statement if often based on profile frequency estimates that are rarer than some defined value, generally more than the Earth’s population.
Sperm cell fraction: the portion of a sample produced during differential extraction containing DNA from sperm cell.
Standards: criteria established for quality assurance purposes that place specific requirements on laboratories and analysts; also refers to well characterized samples that can aid calibration of measurements.
Stochastic effects: the observation of intra-locus peak imbalance and/or allele drop-out resulting from random, disproportionate amplification of alleles in low-quantity template samples .
Stochastic threshold: the peak height value in a DNA profile above which it is reasonable to assume that, at a given locus, allelic dropout of a sister allele in a heterozygous pair has not occurred in a single-source DNA sample.
STRmix: a probabilistic genotyping software program sold by ESR (Auckland, New Zealand).
Stutter product: a minor peak primarily appearing one repeat unit smaller than the primary STR allele; results from strand slippage during the amplification process.
Title | Categories | Link | hf:doc_categories |
---|
Title | Categories | Link | hf:doc_categories |
---|
Each Australian State and Territory lab apply differing methods of reporting DNA.
Further reporting is regularly conducted close to trial.
Lab expert opinion or weighting of the results is frequently presented orally at trial.
Investigator Mediated DNA Contamination can significantly complicate what can be understood regarding DNA deposition in the matter and frequently leads to exclusion of evidence.
It is commonly understood that DNA will be transferred onto the outside of sample packaging during collection and with subsequent handling to varying degrees. This transferred DNA can and does make it’s way to other items.
The presence and amount of offender DNA was linked largely to the offenders shedding rate. The study design incorporated a DNA free human size mannequin.
This study found that 64% of 5 contributor DNA profiles, and 24% of 4 contributor profiles were incorrectly assigned.
This 2023 peer reviewed scientific study provides critically relevant data on the frequency of false positives using ‘confirmatory’ blood tests.
DNA upon a discarded firearm cartridge case is undoubtedly significant information for the courts to consider. This study found that the non–handler was identified upon
63% false positive rate – DNA inside the vagina. Criminal lawyer explainer regarding DNA transfer via a speculum.
This recently published 2024 peer reviewed published scientific paper seeks to provide clarity as to the likelihood of indirect transfer of semen.
High speed collision – trace DNA air bag – trace DNA steering wheel – Single source profile – collision reconstruction – organised crime
Two vehicles were travelling in the same direction within a 100km zone when they collided, causing extensive damage and coming to a stop. Witnesses state the drivers engaged in a confrontation and fled the scene on foot. The evidence appeared inconclusive as to vehicle ownership and criminal association was alleged between the drivers. The defendant’s wallet was recovered from the vehicle along with a single source DNA profile from the deployed airbag matching his profile, as did a profile from the steering wheel. Charges were discontinued by prosecution.
Generally, an airbag contained within its housing provides limited opportunity for the collection of background DNA, or the inadvertent transfer of DNA. In this matter, the centre of the deployed airbag was sampled to obtain a clear single source profile matching the defendant. This result was complicated by the handling of the vehicle post- crash, in which it was essentially treated as ‘non evidential’.
Sexual assault – digital penetration – trace DNA – social interaction – garment damage
The parties were unknown to each other until the evening in question, with there being acknowledged social interaction including climbing fences. The complainant alleged sexual assault and that it culminated in her underwear tearing. The mater was complicated by the underwear not having been surrendered for 4 days and that various DNA sampling locations were combined into one sample.
Six areas both inside and outside the underwear were sampled into one, meaning it was unknown as to where the trace DNA was obtained. The retention of the underwear and the recovery of DNA attributable to the accused from her rings further complicated the consideration as to the propensity for the defendants DNA to have been inadvertently redistributed by the complainant upon the underwear, in the days following.
Sexual assault – digital penetration – oral vaginal penetration– absence of saliva testing – oral rinse – trace DNA – social interaction – showering – clothes washing
The parties were in social interaction at a work function and returned late in the evening to the defendant’s house. The allegedly intoxicated complainant awoke recalling admissions of oral/vaginal sex were made that are subsequently denied by the defendant. Failure to test for saliva and washing of the complainants’ clothes complicates the competing versions.
The low vaginal swabs produced a mixed DNA profile with the major contribution matching the accused, in conjunction with the complainant and her partner. Further complicating the matter was the complainant’s statement that sexual contact with her partner had not occurred in the preceding days.
Sexual assault – oral penile penetration – digital penetration – external mouth penile contact – absence of spermatozoa – oral rinse – trace DNA – social interaction
Alleged oral and vaginal penile penetration are denied whilst it is acknowledged that kissing and touching occurred. The parties were in uncontested social contact over the preceding period that evening. The allegation relies upon YSTR DNA obtained external to the mouth and DNA upon the body variously, whilst there is no DNA obtained internally or vaginally and positive saliva results exist.
The sperm fraction resultant from the differential extraction failed quantification, whilst the non-sperm fraction was subject to Y STR DNA analysis and produced an inclusionary result and likelihood ratio. Extensive testing of various samples ceased at quantification. Numerous samples were subjected to saliva testing, including the RSID test providing positive and negative results and saliva could not be reliably confirmed. Inclusionary DNA results could not be attributed to biological fluid.
Cold Case – Homicide – Stabbing – Crime scene officer contamination – DNA transfer –– Complex mixed DNA profiles – Low level mixed DNA profiles –– Lab contamination – edged weapon blade geometry
A complex crime scene relying on trace DNA where officers DNA is obtained within crime scene profiles. Officers entered and exited the crime scene in proximity to the deceased before, during and after the taking of samples, when those officers duties place them in physical presence of the accused and the samples themselves.
This matter critically relies upon DNA samples which were extracted from hair and fibre samples collected in an era predating forensic DNA familiarity. An extensive crime scene records and contemporaneous notes review seeks to evaluate the possible and potential pathways for the defendant’s DNA present within the trace mixed DNA profiles taken from and adjacent to the deceased, which also bore contribution of the attending and non-attending crime scene officers and lab staff.
Violent group brawl – Homicide – Stabbing – Bloodstain pattern analysis – DNA transfer – edged weapon blade geometry – Complex mixed DNA profiles – Low level mixed profiles – Complex crime scene
A highly complex crime scene with multiple injured persons leading to various potential or possible blood contributions, multiple alleged assailants, multiple bladed weapons recovered and evidenced with voluminous testing and retesting of samples including complex and low-level multiple contributor mixed DNA profiles.
This complex matter seeks to methodically evaluate the crime scene factors minded towards understand the contributions of potential blood upon various weapons and moveable items related to both the crime scene itself and numerous subsequent locations. Further, DNA transfer presents as a significant consideration which is complicated further by multiple known and unknown persons within the crime scene and the potential for those individuals to have contacted persons and surfaces both before, during and after the brawl itself.
LAWYERS-DNA TOOLKIT
Please choose an option:
Guest Access - Please enter your email:
Login/Register:
Already have an account? Login
Login:
Don't have an account? Register